Skip to content
Brand protectionLaw & policy

Hudson’s Detroit developer tries to reverse hijack domain name

Bedrock Management Services came to the UDRP with a weak claim and left with a label no developer wants: reverse domain name hijacker.

Bedrock, the force behind Detroit's Hudson's redevelopment, filed a cybersquatting complaint over a domain registered before the company had trademark rights in 'Hudson's Detroit.' UDRP law is unforgiving on this point: trademark rights must predate the registration, or the case fails at the threshold.

The panel didn't just deny the transfer. It found reverse domain name hijacking — meaning Bedrock knew, or should have known, its complaint was doomed. In UDRP terms, that's the difference between losing a case and being branded an abuser of the process.

For domain owners, the lesson is quiet comfort: registration date remains the strongest defense in the book. A domain registered years before a company's rights existed is not cybersquatting; it's chronology.

For companies, the lesson is cheaper to learn here than in legal fees. Filing a complaint to pressure a registrant into a sale — rather than because the law supports you — is how a developer's name gets attached to 'reverse hijacker' in every industry headline.

The originaldomainnamewire.com

The reporting is Domain Name Wire’s; the read above is Handlemart’s.

Read it on Domain Name Wire